Free tool · rules verified 29 July 2026

Virtual staging disclosure generator

Pick your province and get wording you can paste straight into your MLS remarks, your watermark, a social caption or your listing site.

Every snippet is marked Required or Recommended, because in ten of thirteen Canadian jurisdictions nothing actually compels you to disclose. Other tools hand you “compliance templates” without telling you that. Knowing which is which is the difference between following a rule and following a suggestion someone wrote.

Ontario — suggested disclosure; check local rules

PropTx Article 5.01(a) prohibits altered images that inaccurately depict the property; that article does not specify a virtual-staging label. This finding is limited to the published PropTx rules, not every Ontario board or circumstance. TRESA still prohibits misleading advertising. We recommend clear disclosure using a format your MLS accepts, and retaining the original.

See the actual rule and its source →
On the image (recommended)Suggested wording

Virtually staged

Recommended only where your MLS accepts on-image labels. PropTx Article 5.01 also restricts advertising-message images; confirm the accepted format.

MLS public remarks (recommended)Suggested wording

Some photos are virtually staged. Furniture is digitally added; the property is otherwise shown as-is.

Public remarks. PropTx doesn't ask for this. What PropTx Art. 5.01(a) does prohibit is a digitally altered image that doesn't accurately depict the property — so the real compliance work is in what you edit, not what you write.

Social postSuggested wording

Virtually staged to show the space furnished — the room itself is exactly as you'll find it.

In the caption, not buried in comments or a reply.

Property website / feature sheetSuggested wording

Virtually staged. Furniture and décor have been digitally added to illustrate the space. No structural features, finishes or views have been altered.

Directly beneath the image gallery, or as a caption on each staged photo.

These snippets are suggested wording, not a finding that no duty exists in Ontario. Check the source edition and your MLS instructions. A label does not make an inaccurate image acceptable.

The statutory figures below were researched in July 2026 and have not been reverified in this October disclosure audit. They are general offence or discipline limits, not automatic fines for a missing photo label. Check the linked current legislation before relying on an amount.

What it costs to get this wrong in Ontario

Court fine — individual$50,000 + up to 2 years less a day
Court fine — brokerage$250,000
RegulatorRECO discipline committee fine: up to $50,000 for a broker or salesperson, up to $100,000 for a brokerage. (This is the figure usually quoted — it is a discipline fine, not a court fine.)
TRESA ss. 40(3), 21(4) · Read the section

And the one almost nobody mentions — federal, applies everywhere

Most realtor-facing guides list provincial fines and stop. For a brokerage, the federal exposure is three to four orders of magnitude larger than the provincial one.

Individual: Greater of $750,000 (first order) / $1,000,000 (each subsequent), or 3× the benefit derived

Corporation: Greater of $10,000,000 (first order) / $15,000,000 (each subsequent), or 3× the benefit derived — or 3% of annual worldwide gross revenues if that can't be determined

Criminal track: On indictment: fine at the court's discretion, up to 14 years. On summary conviction: $200,000 and up to 1 year.

Competition Act, RSC 1985, c. C-34, ss. 74.1(1)(c), 52(5) · Read the section

Why the wording says what it says

A disclosure is one sentence, and every part of it is doing a job. If you would rather write your own than paste ours, this is what to keep.

“Some images” — not “images”

It scopes the statement. Most listings mix staged and unedited photos, and a blanket “images have been virtually staged” tells a buyer the whole gallery was worked on. That is its own kind of inaccurate, and it makes the honest photos look suspect.

“Virtually staged” — not “enhanced”, “edited” or “AI”

It is the term the rulebooks use, so it maps onto something. Alberta’s MLS rules define Virtually Staged and Virtually Enhanced as two different things, with two different consequences — staging is disclosed, enhancing is banned. “Enhanced” is the word for the prohibited one. Using it about your own photo describes something you did not do.

In the public remarks, not just a photo caption

Alberta and PEI both name that field specifically — the wording in each is that the listing brokerage must disclose it in the public remarks on the Board’s MLS® System. There is a practical reason as well as a drafting one: remarks travel with the listing to Realtor.ca and IDX feeds. A caption attached to one image often does not.

It says what was added — it does not apologise

A disclosure is a statement of fact about the listing, not a disclaimer about your tools. “Furniture has been added digitally” is a fact. “Images may not reflect actual condition” is a hedge, and a hedge invites the question of what else might not reflect actual condition.

In Quebec, distinguish the requirement from the example

The OACIQ guideline asks for a clear and visible statement such as “Image generated by artificial intelligence”. That is example wording. The disclosure duty is real, but the cited guidance does not make this the only acceptable sentence or establish Centris-specific placement.

Each rule quoted above is set out in full, with its source and date, in the rules by province.

Before you rely on this

This page is information, not legal advice. I'm a licensed REALTOR®, not a lawyer. Every rule below is quoted from a primary source and linked so you can read it yourself — and where a rule has not been verified, the gap is stated. Rules change, and board MLS rules aren't public, so confirm anything you're relying on with your own board or regulator before you act on it.

Researched and maintained by Ali Annabi, Licensed REALTOR®, Ontario.